Investing and Conserving Will Safeguard Our Future
Advancements in weather and economic modeling are documenting the cost
of man-made carbon dioxide and other pollutants. The White
House is concerned of the financial concerns of climate change. The White House
Budget Chief, Shaun Donovan, comments below;
…global economic output could suffer by
about 0.90 percent in the United States that would amount to whacking of gross
domestic product by $150 billion a year.
And as the Great Recession demonstrated, “even small reductions in real
GDP can dramatically reduce federal revenue, drive our deficits and impact the
government’s ability to serve the public,”…1
Conserving certainly can lessen our nearly $18 trillion national
debt. Also we can invest in new economic
development program to combat this human environmental crisis.
According to the American Geophysical Union, 80 percent of the
increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere since 1700’s has occurred in the
20th and 21st centuries. Also the Pew Center on Global Climate Change cited
that the 1990s were the hottest decade in the last 150 years.
In 2006, Winds
of Change, Eugene Linden charts how public and scientific opinion diverged
from 1988 to 2005. Scientific community view has gone from indifference to
alarm with a general consensus while the public view has been indifferent
except for a brief alarm in the late 1980’s. In a Pew Research poll in 2006
only 41 percent said this was due to human activity. In a University of
California 2005 study Dr. Naomi Oreske did a random sampling of 928
peer-reviewed journal articles on global warming revealed that 100 percent agreed
with the view that humans affect climate change.
Now various economist estimate costs to
contain present emissions, the Pew Center for Global Climate Change determined
the benefits to prevent the doubling of greenhouse gaseous between $55 billion
and $140 billion dollars and that US greenhouse gas emission increased 12
percent between 1990 and 2001. In 2006, the Stern Review on the Economic
Effects of Climate Change estimates stabilizing these emission would cost about
half a trillion dollars.
Recent scientific studies document that
climate change is increasing due what is called positive tipping points
accelerating arctic ice loss and other warming effects. Increased conservation directly
translates in increasing our national security.
In my life, science has documented how
this earth has rapidly increased in temperature while human population has
doubled in size. I have witnessed many forms of human ecological destruction.
New advancements of weather modeling now estimate how much humans contribute to
increased droughts, wildfires and other climate disasters. The debate is
over. Humans are impacting our
weather. Enacting conservation measure
and enacting some form of carbon tax are viable remedies. We can no longer afford
to speculate since the present facts dictate that we act.
1
Lory Montgomery, Washington Post, 9/20/14, pg. A14, “Climate
Change is New Focus of White House Financial Fears”.
Comments